Dose Recommendations for Common Drugs in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The presence of liver cirrhosis affects the selection and dosing of drugs metabolised by the liver as doses have to be adjusted to the remaining liver function. This is a major challenge in clinical practice as specific guidelines are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify drugs for which recommendations on selection and dose adjustments for patients with cirrhosis exist by assessing the literature according to certain quality standards, paying particular attention to the suitability of these recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature review included peer-reviewed publications that were published by October 2020 in PubMed in the English language and aimed to generate recommendations on dose adjustment in patients with liver cirrhosis. Subsequently, the identified publications were checked for reporting quality against the relevant reporting guidelines and the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Finally, all specific dose recommendations were extracted, compared with the specifications of the Summaries of Product Characteristics and mapped according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose Index. RESULTS: Eighteen publications covering a total of 1145 dose recommendations for 481 active substances were identified. There were 706 recommendations for 316 substances sufficiently specific for application in clinical practice. For 22 active substances, the specific recommendations were consistent across multiple publications, of which only six were also consistent with the respective Summaries of Product Characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: As the majority of dose recommendations were not sufficiently specific or even contradictory, there is an urgent need for the definition of standard parameters for a uniform assessment of drugs in liver cirrhosis. In addition, dose recommendations should be aligned by suitable methods.

Prioritisation of Adverse Drug Events Leading to Hospital Admission and Occurring during Hospitalisation: A RAND Survey.

(1) Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a common cause of emergency department visits and occur frequently during hospitalisation. Instruments that facilitate the detection of the most relevant ADEs could lead to a more targeted and efficient use of limited resources in research and practice. (2) We conducted two consensus processes based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, in order to prioritise ADEs leading to hospital admission (panel 1) and occurring during hospital stay (panel 2) for inclusion in future ADE measurement instruments. In each panel, the experts were asked to assess the "overall importance" of each ADE on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not important to 4 = very important). ADEs with a median rating of ≥3 without disagreement were defined as "prioritised". (3) The 13 experts in panel 1 prioritised 38 out of 65 ADEs, while the 12 experts in panel 2 prioritised 34 out of 63 ADEs. The highest rated events were acute kidney injury and hypoglycaemia (both panels), as well as Stevens-Johnson syndrome in panel 1 and rhabdomyolysis in panel 2. (4) The survey led to a set of ADEs for which there was consensus that they were of particular importance as presentations of acute medication-related harm, thereby providing a focus for further medication safety research and clinical practice.